any of you knew that the state exams (the old maturity, so to speak), professor of religion would have its say in damage (or increased sense) the average examiner? And you know that this decision was rejected by the Tar?
Again, like the previous one published, in fact, we learn only from the printed version, supported by Article archive Courier.
I wonder (and ask) whether that decision should not per se against the idea of \u200b\u200bthe secular state (and culture, I hope) so many times opposed by our politicians in pairs and then left to be regulated in other fields parede such as this. Here is the text of the article:
The Tar: "No credits from 'time religion"
ROME - The professor of religion will not be able to weigh their opinions in' school credit assignment of maturity (now up to 20 points) making use of the boys' education. TAR of Lazio has suspended as a precautionary measure the 'Order of the Ministry of No. 26 March 15 (which prefigures the reform of the state exams) in paragraph recognizing the teacher of religion that possibility. The suspension comes just days before the meetings of the faculty. No comment for now, the Ministry of 'Education. Viale Trastevere appeal the decision of Tar? Time to take any initiative is very limited. It is likely that the next round of tests, about 20 000 teachers of religion can not make their contribution, in some cases significantly, for the evaluation of the "schooling" of children, as they used to do the 'maturity was 99 when reformed. The suspension request was submitted by trade unions, associations and religious denominations other than Catholic. The dispute over the powers of a professor of religion sees lined up on the one hand the union and secular associations, think of 'inadmissibility of their proceedings for the rejection, promotion or admission to the state exams for students who follow the' teaching; from 'other Catholic associations. 'S order of March 15, in which Fioroni reiterated that the frequency of' teaching of the Catholic religion or of 'alternative activity can give the school credit, has rekindled the conflict. The administrative court, said with satisfaction Enrico Panini, general secretary of the FLC-CGIL, has identified some of the points 'order,' the risk of violation of the Constitution and other laws. " "The curriculum - continuous Panini - the 'teaching of religion can not in any way, contribute to the formation of school credit for the matriculation exams, as this would lead to unequal treatment with Students who do not follow either the 'religious teaching nor benefit from replacement activities. " According to the union "will now be an urgent task of the Ministry inform the change of schools indicated that in a few days will be engaged in the polls." "This decision is no wonder a lot - says Nicola Incampo, associate professor of religion and the Catholic Culture site - because the 'order of the Minister Fioroni extended the recognition of a credit even to kids who do not follow the' teaching of the Catholic religion, which have Following the development of alternatives. " "Fioroni - concluded Incampo - did not merely confirm what the Minister Berlinguer, in '99, had already prepared when he reformed the 'state exam. "
Marco Paperini
Just